Talk:Library List: Difference between revisions
imported>SirCmpwn No edit summary |
imported>SirCmpwn |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Classification == | |||
I'm curious to know what is classified as a library for this purpose. I am currently investigating the possibility of creating a SMP "Bot Library" with common tasks for manipulating a character and therefor not specifically protocol manipulation. At best guess I'd be writing JNI wrappers for the existing C++ library (not sure which one) and writing handlers for various bot related task (OnEnemySight, etc). Would this be a valid entry into this list (assuming a find it a feasible project)? | I'm curious to know what is classified as a library for this purpose. I am currently investigating the possibility of creating a SMP "Bot Library" with common tasks for manipulating a character and therefor not specifically protocol manipulation. At best guess I'd be writing JNI wrappers for the existing C++ library (not sure which one) and writing handlers for various bot related task (OnEnemySight, etc). Would this be a valid entry into this list (assuming a find it a feasible project)? | ||
[[User:Codereign|Codereign]] 21:09, 16 August 2011 | |||
== Removing C++ LibMinecraft == | == Removing C++ LibMinecraft == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
I think this page is supposed to target Beta-generation libraries? Besides, this project is already on the Classic library list. [[User:SirCmpwn|SirCmpwn]] 13:33, 9 January 2012 (MST) | I think this page is supposed to target Beta-generation libraries? Besides, this project is already on the Classic library list. [[User:SirCmpwn|SirCmpwn]] 13:33, 9 January 2012 (MST) | ||
== Merging with Utility List == | |||
Any objection to merging this page and [[Utility List]]? There seems to be a lot of overlap, and having everything in one sortable table could be useful. [[User:Benc|Benc]] 10:53, 13 August 2012 (MST) | |||
Yes, I object to this. Libraries and utilities serve different purposes - libraries are not standalone, and provide support for other things. Utilities are standalone. | |||
Revision as of 06:58, 17 August 2012
Classification
I'm curious to know what is classified as a library for this purpose. I am currently investigating the possibility of creating a SMP "Bot Library" with common tasks for manipulating a character and therefor not specifically protocol manipulation. At best guess I'd be writing JNI wrappers for the existing C++ library (not sure which one) and writing handlers for various bot related task (OnEnemySight, etc). Would this be a valid entry into this list (assuming a find it a feasible project)? Codereign 21:09, 16 August 2011
Removing C++ LibMinecraft
I removed this project:
! LibMinecraft | Yuri Sevatz | C++ | GPLv3 |-
I think this page is supposed to target Beta-generation libraries? Besides, this project is already on the Classic library list. SirCmpwn 13:33, 9 January 2012 (MST)
Merging with Utility List
Any objection to merging this page and Utility List? There seems to be a lot of overlap, and having everything in one sortable table could be useful. Benc 10:53, 13 August 2012 (MST)
Yes, I object to this. Libraries and utilities serve different purposes - libraries are not standalone, and provide support for other things. Utilities are standalone.